Quick answer
To compare Root cause results, keep input, format and settings fixed and change one variable. QA finds symptoms; root causes usually sit in knowledge, process, system or product.
Why it matters
Changing several variables at once makes results unattributable.
Use 5 Whys until you reach an actionable layer.
Step by step
- Define QA goals and observable behaviors before building a giant scorecard.
- Stratify samples by shift, channel and risk so they represent real problems.
- Calibrate scoring boundaries before ranking or performance decisions.
- Attribute issues to knowledge, process, system or people before choosing fixes.
Common mistakes
- Scoring without calibration makes managers incomparable.
- Sampling only easy tickets biases the result.
- Using QA as punishment makes agents hide context.
- Looking only at CSAT while ignoring resolution and rework.
Checklist
- Scorecard has behavioral anchors.
- Sampling has stratification rules.
- Calibration records disputed samples.
- Issues have owners and review dates.
Key facts
- Use 5 Whys until you reach an actionable layer.
- Separate knowledge gaps, process defects, system limits and execution.
- Give every root cause an owner and verification metric.
FAQ
How do I compare two Root cause results?
To compare Root cause results, keep input, format and settings fixed and change one variable. QA finds symptoms; root causes usually sit in knowledge, process, system or product.
How long does it take?
Usually 1-3 minutes; for intermittent issues, run 30 seconds and retest elsewhere.
Is data uploaded?
Runs locally and does not upload video/audio; extensions may still read the page.
Source: ASQ